Jay’s post on the use of Rethinking and Taking Seriously in legal scholarship reminds me that my current project (to be eviscerated at PrawfsFest! this week) is entitled The Irrepressible Myth of Klein. Surprisingly enough, a Westlaw search found only three other cases that have been tagged as irrepressible myths by scholars.
Can you name them?
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett: Adam Steinman Marbury v. Madison: Michael Paulsen Erie RR v. Tompkins: John Hart Ely
Posted by Howard Wasserman on December 8, 2008 at 10:27 AM
Comments
Don’t forget:
“X and its Discontents” and
“We are all X Now.”
Posted by: Law Review Articles Editor | Dec 9, 2008 8:19:00 PM
Indeed you have. Welcome.
Posted by: krs | Dec 9, 2008 4:44:16 PM
Yes, but we’ve brought a fresh keg!
Posted by: Jay Wexler | Dec 8, 2008 5:52:03 PM
You and Jay are both late to the party.
http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2007/08/disaggregating-.html http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/08/a_sample_law_re.html
Posted by: krs | Dec 8, 2008 3:00:55 PM