Job talks: topics to avoid

Once again the law blogosphere is alive with discussions of the hiring process. A few years ago (okay, six) I posted some job talk topics that I thought candidates should avoid. Since recycling is now part of our moral duty, I’m recycling this old material — with five new topics added in to justify it.

Here are the top-ten topics to avoid from 2005:

10. Time Travel and Originalism: Using Technology to Learn What the Founders Really Meant

9. The Right to Bear Arms Should Include Surface-to-Air Missiles

8. The Law and Economics of Negligence: What I Learned in 1L Torts

7. The Sex Life of Law Students: My Three-Year Empirical Study

6. Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is? A Deontological Approach to Epistemological Failure

5. The Law & Economics of Law & Order

4. La Cosa Blogstra: Why volokh.com is a Criminal Conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371

3. Barking Up the (Wrong) Poisonous Tree: Is Tainted Evidence Admissible If It Would Have Been Found By Dogs?

2. Parsing Rule 10b-5: Thoughts from Das Kapital

1. In re Random Corp. Class Action Litigation: Illuminating Points I Made in My Brief

I think #9 looks a little different in hindsight, no? And here are five more:

11. Rethinking the Eighteenth Amendment: An Argument for Repeal

12. Scoop or Else: Using DNA Evidence to Track Down Dog Waste Offenders

13. Chicken Chicken?: A Response to Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken

14. Don’t Mess with Texas: Why Secession Just Makes Sense

15. Capital Punishment for Misdemeanor Offenses: A Retributive Approach

Posted by Matt Bodie on October 27, 2011 at 03:42 PM

Comments

16. If the penalty is capital punishment, is it still a misdemeanor?

Posted by: Steven Lubet | Oct 27, 2011 4:46:02 PM

Why o’ why don’t you post more, Matt? This blawg is so much better with you.

Posted by: Holling | Oct 27, 2011 3:57:41 PM

Actually, #15 looks a lot like Becker (1968) — the leading law and economics article on criminal punishments. True, it is not a Kantian retributive approach, but it leads right to the conclusion of capital punishment for misdemeanor offenses.

Posted by: TJ | Oct 27, 2011 3:51:36 PM

Discover more from PrawfsBlawg

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading