Well, I have one suggestion. (Thanks, btw, to all those good people who helped us gin up the PoP website!)
Actually, the question of the post is not in jest and not simply a way to sell Privilege or Punish. The other day we received a note from the folks in the Books Dep’t of the Michigan Law Review. They actually *are* soliciting ideas for the Books issue. In particular, they would love readers and writers of Prawfs to send in proposals or manuscripts to them. The link for information regarding submissions to the Books issue can be found here. Good luck!
P.S. Just discovered that Orin’s made some suggestions over here. Feel free to add your own thoughts and recommendations in the comments.
Posted by Administrators on February 24, 2010 at 09:10 PM
Comments
Robert Post and Matt Finkin’s book, For the Common Good: Principles of American Aacademic Freedom, is a natural fit for the Michigan Law Review.
Thinking about recent books in legal history, Lea VanderVelde’s book on Dred Scott could be nicely paired with a very different book on that case (and a few others), Earl Maltz’ book on the Slavery and the Supreme Court, 18245-1861.
Posted by: Alfred | Mar 7, 2010 2:59:07 PM
Well, as long as we’re coughing and navel gazing, I would be remiss if I didn’t say that it would really make my day if someone considered reviewing my book (with Andy Whitford) “Presidential Rhetoric and the Public Agenda: Constructing the War on Drugs” (Johns Hopkins University Press 2009) Our look at legal policy implementation considers the DEA, the US Attorneys, and state enforcement agents. http://www.amazon.com/Presidential-Rhetoric-Public-Agenda-Constructing/dp/0801893461/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1267151309&sr=1-1
Posted by: Jeff Yates | Feb 25, 2010 9:33:28 PM
Jay, you should have that cough looked at.
Posted by: Paul Horwitz | Feb 25, 2010 10:50:04 AM
Cough cough, holy cough cough hullabacoughcoughcoughloos.
Posted by: Jay Wexler | Feb 25, 2010 9:42:33 AM